Okay so here I am, not concentrating on my Con Law (anyone else see a pattern?) again. So I decided to check out my new favorite site, Foamy the Squirrel!! It's the best waste of time that I've seen in a while! Any thanks I may receive for offering this contribution may be forwarded to Dana.
So check this cartoon out:
Foamy Rant 2: The fat bastards that sued McDonalds
Sunday, November 13, 2005
Thursday, November 10, 2005
'Ello Bridget! So, how's your love life?
Alright. All those who do not wish to know anything about my love life should just stop reading now. Of course, we all know you're going to read anyway due to your morbid curiosity.
I am now officially Bridget Jones. And apparently single women DO have scales. Why? Because apparently if you are single for just about six months, suddenly 13 year olds attempt to set you up with their cousins named Bubba (or something akin to it, I don't remember what his name was) and your "friends" at work want to put you up on a personals site. A personals site!!
Why they HELL would I want to post my picture and a cute little profile? Is it really that bad to be single? Is it even worse that I like being by myself right now? It's not that boys aren't great, I mean they're good for occasional amusement....let's face it. Most of the time, the whole dating scheme is kind of a hassle, and it really is no fun trying to explain to people about how studying in law school is NOT like undergrad where you can study the morning of a test.
Besides, then you have to make time for them. And you all know I don't have much time in the first place. Uggh.
So my point here was this: since when did being single become the ultimate evil? Why does everyone either have to be paired off or married? It doesn't make you whole kids, it just makes you a part of someone else's identity - which can be a good or bad thing, depending on how it happens. You know what another word for that is? Co-dependency.
Alright I'm going to finish studying about the Erie Doctrine and drink my coffee in my apartment with my cat. Sounds fabulous. :)
I am now officially Bridget Jones. And apparently single women DO have scales. Why? Because apparently if you are single for just about six months, suddenly 13 year olds attempt to set you up with their cousins named Bubba (or something akin to it, I don't remember what his name was) and your "friends" at work want to put you up on a personals site. A personals site!!
Why they HELL would I want to post my picture and a cute little profile? Is it really that bad to be single? Is it even worse that I like being by myself right now? It's not that boys aren't great, I mean they're good for occasional amusement....let's face it. Most of the time, the whole dating scheme is kind of a hassle, and it really is no fun trying to explain to people about how studying in law school is NOT like undergrad where you can study the morning of a test.
Besides, then you have to make time for them. And you all know I don't have much time in the first place. Uggh.
So my point here was this: since when did being single become the ultimate evil? Why does everyone either have to be paired off or married? It doesn't make you whole kids, it just makes you a part of someone else's identity - which can be a good or bad thing, depending on how it happens. You know what another word for that is? Co-dependency.
Alright I'm going to finish studying about the Erie Doctrine and drink my coffee in my apartment with my cat. Sounds fabulous. :)
Sunday, November 06, 2005
Torture???
Okay I know I said I'd refrain from politicizing this thing, but why in the world would anyone think that it's permissible to torture people? Yes, I realize it's concerning potential terrorists, but there is one word we need to focus on: "potential." Therefore, we'd be "potentially" torturing innocent people. How does this mesh with our strong stance on human rights? I'll tell you how - it doesn't. In fact, it makes us into the hypocrites we're so well known for being - you can't torture people (or have nukes) but we can! Why? Because we're the United States!
Thank God it's Cheney raising this and not someone legitimate. That's all I have to say. If you want to know why I went off on this small rant, here's the link to the story:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9929724/
Okay I'm going to study now. Constitutional law is calling me. (Ahh the irony the irony)
Thank God it's Cheney raising this and not someone legitimate. That's all I have to say. If you want to know why I went off on this small rant, here's the link to the story:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9929724/
Okay I'm going to study now. Constitutional law is calling me. (Ahh the irony the irony)
Friday, November 04, 2005
Ooohh What Rule Are YOU?
YOU ARE RULE 15!
You're a very helpful rule! You allow the attorney to amend their complaint once as a matter of course at any time before the answer is filed, and also allow amendments in other cases. If a claim relates back to the original transaction or occurrence outlined in the complaint, you can amend the complaint, even though the statute of limitations has run.
Like a good friend, you're always there to help out in a bind.
Here's the link if you want to take the test!
Which'>http://quizilla.com/users/WrenchofDelivery/quizzes/Which%20Federal%20Rule%20of%20Civil%20Procedure%20Are%20You%3F/
You're a very helpful rule! You allow the attorney to amend their complaint once as a matter of course at any time before the answer is filed, and also allow amendments in other cases. If a claim relates back to the original transaction or occurrence outlined in the complaint, you can amend the complaint, even though the statute of limitations has run.
Like a good friend, you're always there to help out in a bind.
Here's the link if you want to take the test!
Which'>http://quizilla.com/users/WrenchofDelivery/quizzes/Which%20Federal%20Rule%20of%20Civil%20Procedure%20Are%20You%3F/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)